Type to search

Knowledge Top Stories

What Is the Simla Agreement and Why It Matters Today?

Share

Pakistan has suspended the 1972 Simla Agreement in response to escalating tensions with India following a deadly terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which resulted in the deaths of 26 civilians, including 25 Indian tourists and one Nepalese national. India attributed the attack to Pakistan-based militants, leading to a series of retaliatory measures, including the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty, downgrading diplomatic ties, and closing the only land border crossing with Pakistan.

Advertisements

What is the Simla Agreement?

The Simla Agreement, signed on July 2, 1972, by Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and Pakistani President Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, was a peace treaty aimed at resolving conflicts between the two nations following the 1971 war. Key provisions of the agreement included:

  • Commitment to peaceful resolution of disputes through bilateral negotiations.

  • Respect for the Line of Control (LoC) in Jammu and Kashmir, with both sides agreeing not to alter it unilaterally.

  • Adherence to the principles and purposes of the United Nations Charter in governing bilateral relations.

Implications of the Suspension

The suspension of the Simla Agreement by Pakistan undermines the bilateral framework that has helped manage tensions between the two countries for over five decades. Analysts warn that this move could lead to increased hostilities along the LoC, as the mutual commitment to maintain its sanctity is now in question.

Furthermore, the breakdown of longstanding treaties like the Simla Agreement and the Indus Waters Treaty removes vital safety nets that have helped manage past crises between the two nations. The current stalemate threatens fragile peace mechanisms and deepens the risk of conflict between the nuclear-armed neighbors.​

India has not yet issued an official response to Pakistan’s announcement. However, the situation remains volatile, with both nations exchanging threats and taking retaliatory measures that could further escalate tensions in the region.​